Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 11:49
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
These glowing axolotls may hold the secret to human limb regeneration - MSN
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Universe emerged from time, not from space? New theory shows how - Interesting Engineering
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What are some highly recommended call center projects?
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
FIFA Club World Cup predictions: Who are tournament favorites? - MLSsoccer.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Juror Dismissed In Sean "Diddy" Combs Trial For Perceived "Lying" - Deadline
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What type of sex do women prefer, oral, anal, or vaginal?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?